Blog powered by Typepad

« Six Degrees of . . . . | Main | Check Out Shimerprez Elsewhere »



TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference True or False :


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I've tangled with this at somewhat greater length here: . Quite a thought-provoker, this quote.


^ "makes sense."


There's certainly a lot of truth to it, and IMO we would benefit from a better understanding of how (and why!) Shimer has moved between the poles of "general education" and "Great Books" over the years. But one of the courses that still bears the clearest traces of its U of C origins is Soc 1 (which was Soc 2 at the U of C). This is certainly a Great Books course as that term is understood at Shimer. But perhaps that simply highlights the differences between the Shimerian understanding of that term and e.g. the Johnnie understanding.

If one starts with an understanding of "Great Books education" as limited to the established canon, Levine's statement that the later U of C program was "not a Great Books program" but merely "included some Great Books along with other texts whose selection was geared to progressive mastery of some basic ideas and methods of the various arts and sciences" ... but to a Shimerian, that description sounds like what we've been calling Great Books education all along.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment